Verrecchia v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Deanna Verrecchia
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 5:2017cv06544
Filed: November 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Riverside
Presiding Judge: Susan van Keulen
Referring Judge: Lucy H Koh
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2018 Case transferred from the Northern District of California has been opened in CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA as case 2:18-cv-01347 (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2018)
February 16, 2018 Filing 21 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1)from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the actions on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the Central District of California to become part of MDL 2814. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2018)
February 9, 2018 Filing 20 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Rowena Guillermo Santos Notice to Remove/Withdraw an Attorney from the Docket (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 2/9/2018)
February 9, 2018 Filing 19 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Rowena Guillermo Santos Notice to Remove/Withdraw an Attorney from the Docket (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 2/9/2018)
November 30, 2017 Filing 18 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Stay as Moot (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 11/30/2017)
November 29, 2017 Filing 17 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Stay all proceedings and deadlines filed by Ford Motor Company. Responses due by 12/4/2017. (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 11/29/2017)
November 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings pursuant to Related Case Order. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Judge Beth Labson Freeman no longer assigned to the case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2017) Modified on 11/27/2017 (bwS, COURT STAFF).
November 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/24/2017. (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2017)
November 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to the case. Reassignment Order signed by Executive Committee on 11/24/2017. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibiilty for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2017)
November 22, 2017 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2017)
November 22, 2017 Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Kropp, Garner) (Filed on 11/22/2017)
November 14, 2017 Filing 11 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company re #1 Notice of Removal,, Notice to State Court Clerk and Adverse Parties of Removal of Entire Action to Federal Court (Kropp, Garner) (Filed on 11/14/2017)
November 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Nathanael M. Cousins for all further proceedings pursuant to Order of Recusal. Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd no longer assigned to the case. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2017)
November 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/13/2017. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017)
November 13, 2017 Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/6/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/13/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017)
November 10, 2017 Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/24/2017. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2017)
November 10, 2017 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #3 Jury Demand, #1 Notice of Removal,, #4 Statement, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, #5 Notice (Other) (Kropp, Garner) (Filed on 11/10/2017)
November 10, 2017 Filing 5 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of Answer, Filed in State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Answer to complaint, filed in state court)(Kropp, Garner) (Filed on 11/10/2017)
November 10, 2017 Filing 4 Statement of Corporate Disclosure [F.R.C.P. 7.1] by Ford Motor Company. (Kropp, Garner) (Filed on 11/10/2017)
November 10, 2017 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ford Motor Company. (Kropp, Garner) (Filed on 11/10/2017)
November 10, 2017 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company (Kropp, Garner) (Filed on 11/10/2017)
November 10, 2017 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 17CV316038. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-11869628). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Civil Lawsuit Notice, #5 Exhibit E - Santa Clara ADR Information, #6 Exhibit F - 10-K Form, #7 Exhibit G - Declaration of Spencer P. Hugret in Support of Removal, #8 Exhibit H - Excerpt from Declaration of Payam Shahian, #9 Exhibit I - Offer Letter, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kropp, Garner) (Filed on 11/10/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Verrecchia v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Garner F. Kropp
Represented By: Alexander Gerard Calfo
Represented By: Paul R. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deanna Verrecchia
Represented By: Gillian Mellon
Represented By: Jacob William Cutler
Represented By: Rowena Guillermo Santos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?