Sayad v. Law Offices of Kenosian & Miele, LLP et al
| Patrick Sayad |
| Law Offices of Kenosian & Miele, LLP and SUNLAN-020105, LLC |
| 5:2018cv00448 |
| January 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT: Plaintiff reports that this case has settled. ECF 13 . All previously- scheduled deadlines and appearances are vacated. By April 20, 2018, the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal. If a dismissal is no t filed by the specified date, then the parties shall appear on May 1, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. and show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed. Additionally, the parties shall file a statement in response to this Order no later than April 24, 2018, advising as to (1) the status of the parties' efforts to finalize settlement, and (2) how much additional time, if any, is requested to finalize the settlement and file the dismissal. If a dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated and the parties need not file a statement in response to this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen on 3/21/2018. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
