Iglesia Ni Cristo v. Cayabyab et al
| IGLESIA NI CRISTO |
| LUISITO E CAYABYAB, ISAIAS T SAMSON, ROLANDO DIZON, LIONEL ROQUE DELA USO, ALLAN MONTE DE RAMOS, NEMIS JERIEL, KUIZON LLABAN JESLE, BERNARD GARCIA, LIEZL DIAZ-DEOCAMPO, EDWIN LIONEL R. MORA, ALLAN VILLANUEVA and H20 NOW USA |
| 3:2018cv00561 |
| January 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| San Mateo |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
181
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/15/2021. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2021)
|
|
Filing
178
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS EXCEPT DEFENDANT ALLAN VILLANUEVA; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS TO DEFENDANT ALLAN VILLANUEVA. Show Cause Response due by 9/17/2021. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/9/2021. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2021)
|
|
Filing
158
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT ISAIAS T. SAMSON, JR. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS; AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE ANY MOTION FOR CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT AS TO DEFENDANT JERIEL NEMIS ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 2, 2020. S igned by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/18/2020. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
153
ORDER DENYING 146 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 54. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/8/2020.(blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 125 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 3/31/2020.(blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2020)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 130 PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/19/2020.(blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2020)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER DENYING 58 , 73 ANTI-SLAPP MOTIONS; AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 59 , 60 MOTIONS TO DISMISS, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Amended Pleading due by 9/13/2019. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/23/2019. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2019)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF 81) (svklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2019)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON 15 ANTI-SLAPP MOTION; AND GRANTING 14 MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Amended Pleading due by 10/17/2018. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/26/2018. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2018)
|
|
Filing
46
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER re 45 Case Management Conference - Initial.Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions set for 2/24/2022 09:00 AM. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/21/2022 01:30 PM. Jury Selection set for 5/20/2022, 5/23/2022 09:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 5/23/2022, 5/24/2022, 5/25/2022, 5/26/2022, 5/27/2022, 5/30/2022, 5/31/2022, 6/1/2022, 6/2/2022, 6/3/022 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor before Judge Beth Labson Freeman.Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/26/2018. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
