Robles v. Bank of America, N.A.

Robles v. Bank of America, N.A.

Plaintiff:	Steven Robles
Defendant:	Bank of America, N.A.
Case Number:	5:2018cv00860
Filed:	February 9, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	San Jose Office
County:	Santa Clara
Presiding Judge:	Susan van Keulen
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	47 U.S.C. § 227
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 1, 2018	Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT: Plaintiff reports that this case has settled. ECF 8 . All previously- scheduled deadlines and appearances are vacated. By April 30, 2018, the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal. If a dismissal is no t filed by the specified date, then the parties shall appear on May 8, 2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose and show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed. Additionally, the parties shall file a statement in response to this Order no later than May 1, 2018, advising as to (1) the status of the parties' efforts to finalize settlement, and (2) how much additional time, if any, is requested to finalize the settlement and file the dismissal. If a dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated and the parties need not file a statement in response to this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen on 3/1/2018. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2018)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 1, 2018

Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT: Plaintiff reports that this case has settled. ECF 8 . All previously- scheduled deadlines and appearances are vacated. By April 30, 2018, the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal. If a dismissal is no t filed by the specified date, then the parties shall appear on May 8, 2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose and show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed. Additionally, the parties shall file a statement in response to this Order no later than May 1, 2018, advising as to (1) the status of the parties' efforts to finalize settlement, and (2) how much additional time, if any, is requested to finalize the settlement and file the dismissal. If a dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated and the parties need not file a statement in response to this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen on 3/1/2018. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robles v. Bank of America, N.A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Robles
Represented By:	Joseph Brian Angelo
Represented By:	Elliot Wayne Gale
Represented By:	Scott Matthew Johnson
Represented By:	Scott Joseph Sagaria
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?