Johnson v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Dwight Johnson |
| Ford Motor Company, Capitol Ford and Sunnyvale Ford |
| 5:2018cv01026 |
| February 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Lucy H Koh |
| Howard R Lloyd |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from the Northern District of California has been opened in the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA as case 2:18-cv-02066. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2018) |
| Filing 23 CONDITIONAL ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE (CTO-3) from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions on the attached schedule are transferred to the Central District of California to become part of MDL 2814. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2018) |
| Filing 22 Summons Issued as to Capitol Ford, Ford Motor Company, Sunnyvale Ford. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2018) |
| Filing 21 **CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH** Following the case reassignment to Hon. Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for 8/15/2018 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due 7-days before the scheduled conference date. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. (This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice.) (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2018) |
| Filing 20 Proposed Summons. (Obioha, Stephannie) (Filed on 3/7/2018) |
Filing 19
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings pursuant to Notice of Impending Reassignment to a U.S. District Judge. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen remains as referral judge assigned to the case. Reassignment Order signed by Executive Committee on 3/7/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2018) Modified on 3/8/2018 (bwS, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2018) |
| Filing 17 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Dwight Johnson.. (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 3/7/2018) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint for Violation of Statutory Obligations against All Defendants. Filed byDwight Johnson. (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 3/7/2018) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of Filing Notice of Tag-Along Action (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 2/28/2018) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byCapitol Ford. (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 2/23/2018) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of Notice to State Court Clerk and Adverse Parties of Removal of Entire Action to Federal Court (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 2/23/2018) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #9 Order Reassigning Case,, Case Assigned/Reassigned, #8 Order of Recusal, #10 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, of New Civil Case Documents (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 2/21/2018) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SUSAN VAN KEULEN: Following the case reassignment to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for 5/22/2018 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due 7 days before the scheduled conference date. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. The Parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen at http://cand.uscourts.gov/svk. This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2018) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen for all further proceedings. Judge Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Judge Executive Committee on 2/20/18. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2018)
|
| Filing 10 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/15/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/22/2018 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2018) Modified on 2/21/2018 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/16/2018. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2018)
|
| Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/2/2018. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2018) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #4 Statement, #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Jury Demand, #5 Notice (Other) (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 2/16/2018) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of Answer to Complaint, Filed Before Removal (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 2/16/2018) |
| Filing 4 Statement of Disclosure by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 2/16/2018) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 2/16/2018) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 2/16/2018) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Entire Case from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 18CV321806. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12118456). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 2/16/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
