Meza v. Bonnar et al
| Brenda Meza |
| Erik Bonnar, Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Thomas D. Homan and Kirstjen Nielsen |
| 3:2018cv02708 |
| May 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER APPROVING 69 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT OF EAJA MOTION. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/9/2024. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2024)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING 35 RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/26/2022. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2022)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING 20 PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR STAY. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/3/2018. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2018)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/4/2018. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2018)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER GRANTING 3 PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Responses due by 5/17/2018. Replies due by 5/21/2018. Motion Hearing set for 5/24/2018 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 1, 5th Floor before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/10/2018. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
