Alden v. AECOM Technology Corporation et al
| Peter Alden |
| AECOM Technology Corporation and National Aeronautics and Spaced Administration |
| 5:2018cv03258 |
| May 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
190
ORDER denying 188 , 189 Motions for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 6/3/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
179
ORDER GRANTING 166 DEFENDANT AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 4/14/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
111
DISCOVERY ORDER FOLLOWING JANUARY 30, 2020 STATUS CONFERENCE; resolving 103 Motion to Continue. See order for specific discovery action items and deadlines. Further Status Conference set for 2/21/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen on 1/30/2020.(svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2020)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
