Johnson v. Patel et al
| Scott Johnson |
| Nimesh Panchal, Vanitaben Patel and Amita Panchal |
| 5:2018cv04895 |
| August 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Susan van Keulen |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Scott Johnson. Service waived by Vanitaben Patel waiver sent on 10/4/2018, answer due 12/3/2018. (McAllister, Jennifer) (Filed on 10/4/2018) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Scott Johnson. Service waived by Nimesh Panchal waiver sent on 10/4/2018, answer due 12/3/2018. (McAllister, Jennifer) (Filed on 10/4/2018) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Scott Johnson. Service waived by Amita Panchal waiver sent on 10/4/2018, answer due 12/3/2018. (McAllister, Jennifer) (Filed on 10/4/2018) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT FIRST against All Defendants. Filed byScott Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/4/2018) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda Lockhart Seabock (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/4/2018) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Johnson. Amita Panchal served on 8/20/2018, answer due 9/10/2018. (Carson, Chris) (Filed on 8/30/2018) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Johnson. Nimesh Panchal served on 8/20/2018, answer due 9/10/2018. (Carson, Chris) (Filed on 8/30/2018) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Scott Johnson.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Carson, Chris) (Filed on 8/17/2018) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Amita Panchal, Nimesh Panchal, Vanitaben Patel. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (cvS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/27/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Carson, Chris) (Filed on 8/13/2018) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Scott Johnson re #1 Complaint, (Carson, Chris) (Filed on 8/13/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Damages And Injunctive Relief For Violations Of: Americans With Disabilities Act; Unruh Civil Rights Act against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12588104.). Filed byScott Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Carson, Chris) (Filed on 8/13/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
