Express Mobile, Inc. v. The Stephenz Group Inc.
Express Mobile, Inc. |
The Stephenz Group Inc. |
3:2018cv05061 |
August 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Richard Seeborg |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Returned Unexecuted)(Craft, Jeffrey) (Filed on 10/1/2018) |
Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE SCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 11/29/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/6/2018 AT 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2018) |
Filing 15 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Judge Richard Seeborg no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Executive Committee on 9/7/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2018) |
Filing 14 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Executive Committee on 9/7/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2018) |
Filing 13 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Express Mobile, Inc. as to The Stephenz Group Inc.. (Craft, Jeffrey) (Filed on 9/7/2018) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving Same Patent by Express Mobile, Inc. (Craft, Jeffrey) (Filed on 9/6/2018) |
#Electronic filing error Re: #11 Proposed Summons filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. A new summons cannot be issued until th e currently outstanding summons (see document no. #9 ) is returned by e-filing |
Filing 11 Proposed Summons. (Craft, Jeffrey) (Filed on 9/4/2018) |
Filing 10 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding patent infringement (cc: form transmitted to register). (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2018) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to The Stephenz Group Inc.. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2018) |
Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/8/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/15/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2018) |
Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/4/2018. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2018) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Francis Craft for Express Mobile, Inc. (Craft, Jeffrey) (Filed on 8/20/2018) |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Express Mobile, Inc. (Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/17/2018) |
Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Patents (cc: form mailed to register). (Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/17/2018) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/17/2018) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Express Mobile, Inc. . (Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/17/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against The Stephenz Group Inc. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12606051). Filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/17/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Express Mobile, Inc. v. The Stephenz Group Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Express Mobile, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Seth Wesley Wiener |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Francis Craft |
Represented By: | Robert Dean Kiddie, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Stephenz Group Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.