Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Ann Elliott Sherman and Devin Sherman Jones
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 5:2018cv05196
Filed: August 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Referring Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
2 Judge: Lucy H Koh
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2018 Case transferred from the Northern District of California has been opened in CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA as case 2:18-cv-08026 (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018)
September 17, 2018 Filing 15 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-16) from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transferring case 5:18-cv-05196 Jones et al v. Ford Motor Companyto the Central District of California to become part of MDL 2814 (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2018)
September 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Order by Judge Lucy H. Koh Granting #4 Ex Parte Application.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2018)
September 7, 2018 Filing 13 **CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH** Following the case reassignment to Hon. Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for 11/28/2018 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due 7 days before the scheduled conference date. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. (This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice.) (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2018)
September 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings pursuant to Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment to a U.S. District Court Judge. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to the case. Reassignment Order signed by Executive Committee on 9/7/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2018)
September 7, 2018 CASE STAYED pursuant to ECF No. #14 . Clerk shall administratively close the file. (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2018)
September 6, 2018 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2018)
September 6, 2018 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 9/6/2018)
August 27, 2018 Filing 9 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/21/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/28/2018 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2018)
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 8/27/18. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2018)
August 24, 2018 Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint (Exhibit E) by Ford Motor Company. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2018)
August 24, 2018 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company (Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 8/24/2018)
August 24, 2018 Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/7/2018. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2018)
August 24, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving Same Patent by Ford Motor Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 8/24/2018)
August 24, 2018 Filing 4 Ex Parte Application for an Order Staying all Proceedings and Deadlines Pending JPML Determination of Inclusion in Multidistrict Litigation filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Molly J. Mrowka, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 8/24/2018)
August 24, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Molly Jeannette Mrowka (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Mrowka, Molly) (Filed on 8/24/2018)
August 24, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Spencer Peter Hugret (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 8/24/2018)
August 24, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 18CV331458. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12623315). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-F, #2 Declaration of Spencer P. Hugret, #3 Declaration of Agatha Guajardo, #4 Declaration of Molly J. Mrowka, #5 Certificate/Proof of Service of Party with Financial Interest, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Certificate/Proof of Service of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 8/24/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Spencer Peter Hugret
Represented By: Molly Jeannette Mrowka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ann Elliott Sherman
Represented By: Amy-Lyn Morse
Represented By: Steve Mikhov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Devin Sherman Jones
Represented By: Amy-Lyn Morse
Represented By: Steve Mikhov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?