Hamm v. Mulligan et al
Steven M. Hamm |
Sean Mulligan and Napa State Hospital Police |
5:2018cv05585 |
September 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Beth Labson Freeman |
PSLC HHL |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Letter from Steven M. Hamm requesting IFP Forms. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2018) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/19/2018. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/23/2018: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tshS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/19/2018. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/23/2018: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tshS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 10/22/2018. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service to Steven Hamm) (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2018) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Steven M. Hamm. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sean Mulligan, Napa State Hospital Police. Filed by Steven M. Hamm. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.