Serrano v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
| Roberta Serrano |
| G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. and Wackenhut Corporation |
| 5:2018cv05753 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Lucy H Koh |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Roberta Serrano. (Hawes, Brian) (Filed on 9/28/2018) |
Filing 11
Order by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2018)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings pursuant to Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment to a U.S. District Court Judge. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras, Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Executive Committee on 9/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2018)
|
| Filing 9 **CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH** Following the case reassignment to Hon. Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for 12/19/2018 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due 7 days before the scheduled conference date. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. (This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice.) (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2018) |
| Filing 8 *** Docketed in Error. See Docket #10 *** ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings pursuant to Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment to a U.S. District Court Judge. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras, Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Executive Committee on 9/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2018) Modified on 9/24/2018 (bwS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice (Kelly Eisenlohr-Moul) ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-12700090.) filed by G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.. (Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly) (Filed on 9/21/2018) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc... (Cortez, Elvira) (Filed on 9/20/2018) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/12/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/19/2018 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 7, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2018) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/3/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2018) |
| Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint (1-1, Exhibit C) by G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2018) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Wackenhut Corporation, Other Affiliate G4S Holding One, Inc., Other Affiliate G4S USA Holdings Limited, Other Affiliate G4S plc for G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.. re 1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Cortez, Elvira) (Filed on 9/19/2018) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 18CV325088. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12693931). Filed byG4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A - D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Cortez, Elvira) (Filed on 9/19/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
