Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Bonutti et al
| Intuitive Surgical, Inc. |
| M.D. Peter M. Bonutti and P Tech, LLC |
| 5:2018cv07039 |
| November 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING Consent or Declination: All parties shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 1/29/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2019) |
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME #9 . Case Management Conference set for 5/22/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 5/15/2019. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 1/15/2019. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2019)
|
| Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CIVIL L.R. 6-3 UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR FILING OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND TO MOVE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, DECLARATION OF SCOTT R. MOSKO IN SUPPORT THEREOF, and [Proposed] ORDER filed by Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. (Mosko, Scott) (Filed on 1/15/2019) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. Service waived by All Defendants. (Mosko, Scott) (Filed on 1/15/2019) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Peter M. Bonutti, P Tech, LLC. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2018) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/13/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/20/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 7, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2018) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/4/2018. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2018) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Intuitive Surgical, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Intuitive Surgical, Inc. for Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. (Mosko, Scott) (Filed on 11/20/2018) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Mosko, Scott) (Filed on 11/20/2018) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Intuitive Surgical, Inc. . (Mosko, Scott) (Filed on 11/20/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12863036.). Filed byIntuitive Surgical, Inc.. (Mosko, Scott) (Filed on 11/20/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
