Doak v. Capital One , N.A.
Plaintiff: Daniel Doak
Defendant: Capital One, N.A.
Case Number: 5:2018cv07102
Filed: November 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward J Davila
Referring Judge: Susan van Keulen
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2019 Filing 13 (Text Only) CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/1/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/11/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Hon. Edward J. Davila. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2019)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings pursuant to Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment to a U.S. District Judge. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen remains as referral judge assigned to the case. Reassignment Order signed by Executive Committee on 1/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2019)
January 18, 2019 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (djmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2019)
January 16, 2019 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Capital One, N.A... (Rao, Arjun) (Filed on 1/16/2019)
December 21, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Arjun P. Rao (Rao, Arjun) (Filed on 12/21/2018)
December 21, 2018 Filing 8 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint Ext of Time to Answer filed by Capital One, N.A.. (Linden, Dustin) (Filed on 12/21/2018)
December 13, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Tiffany Noelle Buda (Buda, Tiffany) (Filed on 12/13/2018)
December 3, 2018 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Daniel Doak.. (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 12/3/2018)
November 21, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Capital One, N.A.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2018)
November 21, 2018 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/12/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/19/2019 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2018)
November 21, 2018 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/5/2018. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2018)
November 21, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 11/21/2018)
November 21, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capital One, N.A. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12867524.). Filed byDaniel Doak. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 11/21/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doak v. Capital One , N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital One, N.A.
Represented By: Dustin Andrew Linden
Represented By: Arjun P. Rao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Doak
Represented By: Adrian R. Bacon
Represented By: Todd Michael Friedman
Represented By: Kelsey Lynn Kuberka
Represented By: John Refaat Habashy
Represented By: Tiffany Noelle Buda
Represented By: John R. Habashy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?