Urena v. Charter Communications, Inc.
Regina Urena |
Charter Communications, Inc. |
5:2018cv07786 |
December 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Virginia K DeMarchi |
Lucy H Koh |
Consumer Credit |
47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Order by Judge Lucy H. Koh Granting #12 Stipulation and Staying Case Pending Arbitration.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Charter Communications, Inc. filed by Charter Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kim, Helen) (Filed on 2/4/2019) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Regina Urena. Charter Communications, Inc. served on 1/14/2019, answer due 2/4/2019. (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy) (Filed on 1/21/2019) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH. Following case reassignment to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh, the Initial Case Management Conference is reset for 4/3/2019 02:00 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor before Hon. Lucy H. Koh. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due 7-days before the scheduled conference date. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ecgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019) |
Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings pursuant to Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment to a U.S. District Judge. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi remains as referral judge assigned to the case. Reassignment Order signed by Executive Committee on 1/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Regina Urena.. (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy) (Filed on 1/11/2019) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Charter Communications, Inc.. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2018) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/26/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/2/2019 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2018) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/11/2019. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2018) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy) (Filed on 12/28/2018) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Regina Urena . (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy) (Filed on 12/28/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Pay.gov tracking ID: 26ED0BCA Agency Tracking ID: 0971-12960198 against Charter Communications, Inc.. Filed byRegina Urena. (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy) (Filed on 12/28/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Urena v. Charter Communications, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Regina Urena | |
Represented By: | Amy Lynn Bennecoff Ginsburg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Charter Communications, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Helen Byungson Kim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.