Beckendorf et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Donald Beckendorf and Susan Beckendorf |
| Ford Motor Company and Gosch Ford Temecula |
| 5:2019cv00049 |
| January 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING #16 STIPULATED DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/17/2019.(blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2019)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (JOINT) to Dismiss Case filed by Donald Beckendorf, Susan Beckendorf. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tai, Daniel) (Filed on 6/14/2019) |
| Reset Case Management Conference: re 15 Order. Case Management Statement due by 7/11/2019. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 7/18/2019 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor.(tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2019) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO JULY 18, 2019; DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE STIPULATED DISMISSAL OR STATUS REPORT RE SETTLEMENT ON OR BEFORE JUNE 17, 2019. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/17/2019. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2019)
|
| Filing 14 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Ford Motor Company, Gosch Ford Temecula. (Subramanian, Vikram) (Filed on 4/16/2019) |
| Filing 13 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Tai, Daniel) (Filed on 4/4/2019) |
| Filing 12 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Subramanian, Vikram) (Filed on 4/1/2019) |
| Filing 11 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #9 MOTION to Remand to Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara ) Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion to Remand filed byDonald Beckendorf, Susan Beckendorf. (Tai, Daniel) (Filed on 2/26/2019) |
| Filing 10 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #9 MOTION to Remand to Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara ) filed byFord Motor Company, Gosch Ford Temecula. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Counsel, #2 Exhibits 1-5 to Declaration of Counsel)(Subramanian, Vikram) (Filed on 2/20/2019) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara filed by Donald Beckendorf, Susan Beckendorf. Motion Hearing set for 7/18/2019 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Responses due by 2/20/2019. Replies due by 2/27/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Daniel Tai, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration, #5 Proposed Order)(Tai, Daniel) (Filed on 2/6/2019) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER STRIKING #7 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/6/2019. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara filed by Donald Beckendorf, Susan Beckendorf. Motion Hearing set for 7/18/2019 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Responses due by 2/19/2019. Replies due by 2/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Daniel Tai, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration, #5 Proposed Order)(Tai, Daniel) (Filed on 2/4/2019) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Chung-Kwang Tai Notice To Remove / Withdraw of Hayk Proshyan (Tai, Daniel) (Filed on 1/31/2019) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Hayk Proshyan (Proshyan, Hayk) (Filed on 1/9/2019) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras Case Management Statement due by 4/18/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/25/2019 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2019) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2019) |
| Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint 1 Ex A by Ford Motor Company, Gosch Ford Temecula. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2019) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company, Gosch Ford Temecula (Subramanian, Vikram) (Filed on 1/3/2019) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 18CV337421. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12970329). Filed byGosch Ford Temecula, Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-B, #2 Declaration of Counsel, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Subramanian, Vikram) (Filed on 1/3/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
