Wood v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Belinda Kay Wood
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 5:2019cv00107
Filed: January 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Virginia K DeMarchi
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Belinda Kay Wood. Nancy A. Berryhill served on 2/1/2019, answer due 4/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipts, #2 Summons)(Lee, Shanny) (Filed on 2/26/2019)
February 4, 2019 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Belinda Kay Wood.. (Lee, Shanny) (Filed on 2/4/2019)
January 25, 2019 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 2/8/2019. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2019)
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Requiring Statements of the Administrative Record. Signed by Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 1/10/2019. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2019)
January 10, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2019)
January 9, 2019 Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER: (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2019)
January 9, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/23/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2019)
January 8, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Lee, Shanny) (Filed on 1/8/2019)
January 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12983644.). Filed byBelinda Kay Wood. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lee, Shanny) (Filed on 1/8/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wood v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Belinda Kay Wood
Represented By: Shanny Jun Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?