Ridola v. Altamira Corporation et al
Rachelle Ridola |
Altamira Corporation, Anna D. Azzarello and Altamira Corporation a California corporation doing business as Arby's |
5:2019cv00394 |
January 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Nathanael M Cousins |
American with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Rachelle Ridola.. (Karbelashvili, Irakli) (Filed on 3/5/2019) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 3/19/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2019) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING Initial Case Management Conference for 6/5/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. Counsel may appear telephonically. Case Management Statement due by 5/29/2019. All parties shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 2/25/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2019) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Altamira Corporation, Anna D. Azzarello. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2019) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Karbelashvili, Irakli) (Filed on 1/23/2019) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2019) |
#Electronic filing error. **Proposed Summons does not list Named Defendant and is Requiring Installation of Chinese Language Packet** This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #2 Proposed Summons filed by Rachelle Ridola (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2019) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/5/2019. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2019) |
Filing 2 *filing error* Proposed Summons. (Karbelashvili, Irene) (Filed on 1/22/2019) Modified on 1/23/2019 (sfbS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13024770.). Filed byRachelle Ridola. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Karbelashvili, Irene) (Filed on 1/22/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.