Ray v. Bloom et al
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr. |
M. Colvin and Ted Bloom |
5:2019cv00715 |
February 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Edward J Davila |
PSLC HHL |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Edward Vincent Ray, Jr. (Attachments: #1 certificate, #2 Envelope)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2019) |
Filing 5 Letter Edward Vincent Ray, Jr dated 3/18/19. re: This was 2nd notification requesting IFP Application #2 Plaintiff complied to the 1st notification that was sent to him on 2/8/19 #2 (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2019) Modified on 3/21/2019 (cv, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/21/2019 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Edward Vincent Ray, Jr. (Attachments: #1 certificate, #2 Envelope)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2019) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #2 Clerk's Notice re: IFP (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2019) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 3/18/2019. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ted Bloom, M. Colvin. Filed byEdward Vincent Ray, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.