Graham v. Finwall Law Offices, et al
| Roy Lee Graham |
| Gordon John Finwall and Finwall Law Offices |
| 5:2019cv01212 |
| March 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 4/29/2019. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2019) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 4/5/2019. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2019) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Roy Lee Graham. Service waived by Gordon John Finwall waiver sent on 3/7/2019, answer due 5/6/2019. (Schwinn, Fred) (Filed on 3/18/2019) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Roy Lee Graham. Service waived by Finwall Law Offices waiver sent on 3/7/2019, answer due 5/6/2019. (Schwinn, Fred) (Filed on 3/18/2019) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Gordon John Finwall. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2019) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Schwinn, Fred) (Filed on 3/6/2019) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Finwall Law Offices. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2019) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/28/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/4/2019 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/20/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13147087.). Filed byRoy Lee Graham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Schwinn, Fred) (Filed on 3/6/2019) |
| #Electronic filing error. Only one summons may be issued for each defendant. Plaintiff submitted two summons for defendant Finwall Law Offices Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Roy Lee Graham (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
