Venkatraman et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York et al
Radhika Venkatraman and Rajamadam C. Venkatraman |
The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, DOES 1 through 50, Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP, Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., a California Corporation and Caliber Home Loans, Inc. |
5:2019cv01386 |
March 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Caliber Home Loans, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York identifying Corporate Parent MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Goldstein, Aaron) (Filed on 3/14/2019) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 19CV341103. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13173185). Filed byThe Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, Caliber Home Loans, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goldstein, Aaron) (Filed on 3/14/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.