David-Oduyemi v. Gilroy Police Department et al
| Lola David-Oduyemi |
| Newark Police Office, Santa Clara County Sheriff, Gilroy Police Department and Alameda County Sheriff |
| 5:2019cv02337 |
| April 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lola David-Oduyemi. (rcsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2019) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 7/25/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/1/2019 at 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 1, 5th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(rcsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alameda County Sheriff, Gilroy Police Department, Newark Police Office, Santa Clara County Sheriff (Filing fee $ 400; Receipt #34611142121). Filed by Lola David-Oduyemi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(rcsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
