Impetus Technologies, Inc. v. Miller
| Impetus Technologies, Inc. |
| Loren K Miller |
| 5:2019cv03470 |
| June 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Impetus Technologies, Inc.. Loren K Miller served on 7/29/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service on Defendant, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service on Attorney General)(Sturman, David) (Filed on 7/31/2019) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Impetus Technologies, Inc... (Sturman, David) (Filed on 6/25/2019) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 7/3/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2019) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Loren K Miller. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2019) |
| Filing 4 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2019) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/2/2019. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2019) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Sturman, David) (Filed on 6/18/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Loren K Miller ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13446500.). Filed byImpetus Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Sturman, David) (Filed on 6/18/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Impetus Technologies, Inc. v. Miller | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Loren K Miller | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Impetus Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David M. Sturman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
