Kizak v. Tencent America LLC
Plaintiff: Heidi Kizak
Defendant: Tencent America LLC
Case Number: 5:2019cv04249
Filed: July 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Susan van Keulen
Referring Judge: Lucy H Koh
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 Filing 21 STIPULATION of Dismissal filed by Heidi Kizak. (Kaufman, Rachel) (Filed on 12/5/2019)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Order Regarding #19 Notice of Settlement. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/07/2019. (lhklc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2019)
November 7, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE by Heidi Kizak of Settlement and Motion to Suspend Deadlines for 30 days (Kaufman, Rachel) (Filed on 11/7/2019)
October 9, 2019 Reset Deadlines/Hearings per #18 Order: Initial Case Management Conference CONTINUED from 11/13/2019 to 2/26/2020 at 2:00 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 2/19/2020. (kedS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2019)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Order by Judge Lucy H. Koh Granting #16 Motion to Dismiss with Leave to Amend.(lhklc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2019)
October 8, 2019 Filing 17 Defendant Tencent America, LLC's Notice of Plaintiff's Non-Opposition to #16 Motion to Dismiss Complaint by Tencent America LLC (Frankel, Simon) (Filed on 10/8/2019) Modified text on 10/25/2019 (dhmS, COURT STAFF).
September 19, 2019 Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Tencent America LLC. Motion Hearing set for 1/23/2020 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor before Judge Lucy H. Koh. Responses due by 10/3/2019. Replies due by 10/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Decl. of A. Richmond, #2 Proposed Order)(Frankel, Simon) (Filed on 9/19/2019)
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order by Judge Lucy H. Koh Granting #14 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2019)
August 8, 2019 Filing 14 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13592354.) filed by Tencent America LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Bosset, Eric) (Filed on 8/8/2019)
August 8, 2019 Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tencent America LLC identifying Corporate Parent Tencent Holdings Limited for Tencent America LLC. (Frankel, Simon) (Filed on 8/8/2019)
August 8, 2019 Filing 12 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint Stipulation Extending Time Within Which Defendant Tencent America, LLC Must Respond to Complaint filed by Tencent America LLC. (Frankel, Simon) (Filed on 8/8/2019)
August 8, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Simon J. Frankel (Frankel, Simon) (Filed on 8/8/2019)
August 8, 2019 Filing 10 **CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH** Following the case reassignment to Hon. Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for November 13, 2019 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. The Joint Case Management Statement is due 7 days prior. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kedS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2019)
August 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Lucy H. Koh. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen remains as the referral judge for all further proceedings. Reassignment Order signed by The Clerk on 8/7/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2019) Modified on 8/8/2019 (bwS, COURT STAFF).
August 6, 2019 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Heidi Kizak re #4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, #5 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint (Ratner, David) (Filed on 8/6/2019)
August 6, 2019 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2019)
August 5, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Heidi Kizak.. (Kaufman, Rachel) (Filed on 8/5/2019)
July 25, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Tencent America LLC. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2019)
July 25, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/15/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/22/2019 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2019)
July 24, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/7/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2019)
July 24, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Ratner, David) (Filed on 7/24/2019)
July 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13548271.). Filed byHeidi Kizak. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ratner, David) (Filed on 7/24/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kizak v. Tencent America LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tencent America LLC
Represented By: Eric C Bosset
Represented By: Simon J. Frankel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heidi Kizak
Represented By: David S. Ratner
Represented By: Rachel Elizabeth Kaufman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?