Rasmussen v. Tesla, Inc.
David Rasmussen |
Tesla, Inc. and Tesla, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Tesla Motors, Inc., |
5:2019cv04596 |
August 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Virginia K DeMarchi |
Susan van Keulen |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE RE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Please take notice that the Initial Case Management Conference has been continued to 12/3/2019 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. The parties' Joint Case Management Statement is due by 11/26/2019. All other related deadlines set in the Court's Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (Dkt. No. #4 ) are adjusted accordingly. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.), (vkdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2019) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by David Rasmussen. Service waived by Tesla, Inc. waiver sent on 9/4/2019, answer due 11/4/2019. (Chen, Edward) (Filed on 9/10/2019) |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by David Rasmussen.. (Chen, Edward) (Filed on 8/21/2019) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.Case Management Statement due by 10/29/19. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/5/2019 01:30PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2019) |
Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi for all further proceedings re #6 Order of Recusal. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to case. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2019) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Clerk of Court to reassign this case to another Judge. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 8/9/2019. (dmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2019) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Tesla, Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2019) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/29/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/5/2019 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2019) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/22/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2019) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Chen, Edward) (Filed on 8/7/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tesla, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13591491.). Filed byDavid Rasmussen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chen, Edward) (Filed on 8/7/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.