Catamount Properties 2018, LLC v. Hines et al
| Catamount Properties 2018, LLC |
| Marlon Jason Hines and Raquel Inez Hines |
| 5:2019cv05437 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND. Defendants to file their response by 10/24/2019. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lmhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2019)
|
| Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Entities by Catamount Properties 2018, LLC re #10 MOTION to Remand (Chandra, Sam) (Filed on 10/2/2019) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand filed by Catamount Properties 2018, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 11/6/2019 01:00 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor before Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Responses due by 10/16/2019. Replies due by 10/23/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Remand, #2 Declaration in Support of Motion, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Exhibit, #5 Signatures, #6 Affidavit of Service)(Chandra, Sam) (Filed on 10/2/2019) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Raquel Inez Hines. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2019) |
| Filing 8 SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING Consent or Declination: Defendant Raquel Inez Hines is requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 9/30/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2019) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Marlon Jason Hines. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2019) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Re: Dkt. No. #2 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2019)
|
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Catamount Properties 2018, LLC.. (Chandra, Sam) (Filed on 9/3/2019) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING. Consent or Declination: Parties are requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 9/13/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2019) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/20/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/27/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2019) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marlon Jason Hines. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2019) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 19cv346304. (). Filed by Raquel Inez Hines, Marlon Jason Hines. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
