Padilla et al v. U.S. Postal Service et al
| Juan padilla, MGR, Sandra Rodriguez and Juan Gomez Padilla |
| The United States Postal Service and United States of America |
| 5:2019cv05560 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1364 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Juan Gomez Padilla (Griffith, Brent) (Filed on 10/28/2019) |
| Filing 7 *Filing Error* CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Juan Gomez Padilla USPS (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Griffith, Brent) (Filed on 10/18/2019) Modified on 10/18/2019 (sfbS, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]*Re-File as Summons Returned Executed*Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #7 Certificate of Service filed by Juan Gomez Padilla (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2019) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING Consent or Declination: All parties are requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge y 10/18/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2019) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to The United States Postal Service, United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2019) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Griffith, Brent) (Filed on 9/19/2019) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/27/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/4/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/20/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2019) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]*Proposed Summons should be filed using the correct event and not as an exhibit or attachment to a document. Re-file as P roposed Summons* This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re:[1-2] As to Summons Only, filed by Juan Gomez Padilla (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13676782.). Filed byJuan padilla. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service, #4 Proposed Order)(Griffith, Brent) (Filed on 9/5/2019) Modified on 9/6/2019 (sfbS, COURT STAFF).*Documents sealed due to listing of minor's full name* |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
