Bryden-Moore v. Nanometrics Inc. et al
| Carol Bryden-Moore |
| Robert Deuster, Pierre-Yves Lesaicherre, Nanometrics Inc., Timothy J Stultz, Bruce C Rhine, Christopher A Seams, Edward J Brown, Jr. and Christine A Tsingos |
| 5:2019cv05625 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Lucy H Koh |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Carol Bryden-Moore (Mah, Rosanne) (Filed on 10/30/2019) |
| Filing 18 **CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH** Following the case reassignment to Hon. Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for February 5, 2020 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. The Joint Case Management Statement is due 7 days prior. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kedS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2019) |
Filing 17
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 10/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2019)
|
| Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2019) |
| Filing 15 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Carol Bryden-Moore.. (Mah, Rosanne) (Filed on 10/23/2019) |
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 10/23/2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2019) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Carol Bryden-Moore. Service waived by All Defendants. (Mah, Rosanne) (Filed on 9/25/2019) |
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Christine A Tsingos. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Nanometrics Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Timothy J Stultz. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Christopher A Seams. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Robert Deuster. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Edward J Brown, Jr.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Pierre-Yves Lesaicherre. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Bruce C Rhine. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/3/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/10/2019 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/23/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Mah, Rosanne) (Filed on 9/6/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13681977.). Filed byCarol Bryden-Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mah, Rosanne) (Filed on 9/6/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
