Rondevoo Technologies LLC v. Optrascan, Inc.
Plaintiff: Rondevoo Technologies LLC
Defendant: Optrascan, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv06339
Filed: October 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: William Alsup
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING #15 STIPULATED REQUEST TO STAY CASE UNTIL DECEMBER 30. Signed by Judge William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2019)
November 14, 2019 Filing 15 UNOPPOSED MOTION WITH PROPOSED ORDER staying all deadlines filed by Rondevoo Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 11/14/2019) Modified on 11/15/2019 (amgS, COURT STAFF).
November 5, 2019 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rondevoo Technologies LLC (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 11/5/2019)
October 30, 2019 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE SCHEDULING CMC ON REASSIGNMENT: Case Management Statement due by 12/26/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/2/2020 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor. Standing orders can be downloaded from the Court's webpage at www.cand.uscourts.gov/whaorders. All pending motions will be taken off-calendar and must be re-noticed by the moving party for a new hearing date on a Thursday at 08:00 AM. The new hearing date must be at least five weeks from the date the motion was filed and at least three weeks from the date the re-notice is filed. The due date for any opposition or reply papers not yet filed shall be calculated in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tlhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2019)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William Alsup for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 10/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2019)
October 28, 2019 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2019)
October 25, 2019 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Rondevoo Technologies LLC.. (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 10/25/2019)
October 22, 2019 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/5/2019. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2019)
October 8, 2019 Filing 8 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 complaint)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2019)
October 8, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Optrascan, Inc.. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2019)
October 8, 2019 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/26/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/2/2020 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2019)
October 3, 2019 Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/17/2019. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2019)
October 3, 2019 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 10/3/2019)
October 3, 2019 Filing 3 Statement Corporate Disclosure by Rondevoo Technologies LLC. (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 10/3/2019)
October 3, 2019 Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding U.S. Patents (cc: form mailed to register). (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 10/3/2019)
October 3, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Rondevoo Technologies LLC ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13763659.). Filed byRondevoo Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 10/3/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rondevoo Technologies LLC v. Optrascan, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rondevoo Technologies LLC
Represented By: Kirk J. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Optrascan, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?