Escalante v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Kevin Escalante |
| Cerritos Ford, Inc. d/b/a Norm Reeves Ford Superstore, Ford Motor Company, Cerritos Ford, Inc and Cerritos Ford, Inc doing business as Norm Reeves Ford Superstore |
| 3:2019cv06853 |
| October 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Change of Address by Tionna Grace Dolin (Dolin, Tionna) (Filed on 1/29/2022) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE by Kevin Escalante of Disassociation of Counsel (Dolin, Tionna) (Filed on 12/18/2021) |
| Filing 18 Acknowledgment of Receipt of certified copy of remand order and docket entries from Santa Clara County Superior Court. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2020) |
| Filing 17 Certified Copy of Remand Order and Docket Entries Mailed to Santa Clara County Superior Court. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2020) |
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge Vince Chhabria granting #10 Motion to Remand. (vclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2020)
|
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE vacating the hearing scheduled for 1/9/2020 re #10 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. The Court will issue a written ruling. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2020) |
| Filing 14 REPLY (re #10 MOTION to Remand ) filed byKevin Escalante. (Aziz, Cinela) (Filed on 12/11/2019) |
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #10 MOTION to Remand ) filed byCerritos Ford, Inc, Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of counsel, #2 Exhibits A-C)(May, Richard) (Filed on 12/4/2019) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Cinela Aziz (Aziz, Cinela) (Filed on 12/2/2019) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING THE HEARING FROM 12/19/2019 TO 1/9/2020 RE #10 MOTION to Remand . The filing party selected a date for hearing that is not in compliance with the local rules of this court. Additionally, the responsive briefing deadlines set in ECF were altered by the filing party and are incorrect. Motion Hearing set for 1/9/2020 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor before Judge Vince Chhabria. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2019) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand filed by Kevin Escalante. Motion Hearing set for 12/19/2019 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor before Judge Vince Chhabria. Responses due by 12/6/2019. Replies due by 12/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proposed Order)(Dolin, Tionna) (Filed on 11/20/2019) |
| Filing 9 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Case Management Statement due by 1/15/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/22/2020 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2019) |
| Filing 8 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Judge Vince Chhabria. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Jude Susan Van Keulen No longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2019) |
| Filing 7 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2019) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2019) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (May, Richard) (Filed on 10/23/2019) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/14/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/21/2020 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2019) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/4/2019. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2019) |
| Filing 1 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Cerritos Ford, Inc, Ford Motor Company. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2019) Modified on 10/22/2019 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company identifying Corporate Parent State Street Corporation, Other Affiliate Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Other Affiliate Black Rock, Inc., Other Affiliate China-Jiangling Motors Corporation, Limited, Other Affiliate Turkey-Ford Otomotiv Anonim Sirketi (Ford Otosan), Other Affiliate Ford Credit Canada Company, Other Affiliate Ford Credit de Mexico S.A., de C.V. Sociedad Financiera de Objeto Multiple, E.R., Other Affiliate Ford Holdings LLC, Other Affiliate FCE Bank plc, Other Affiliate Ford Automotive Finance (China) Limited, Other Affiliate Banco Ford S.A. for Ford Motor Company. re 1 Notice of Removal, (May, Richard) (Filed on 10/21/2019) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 19CV355166. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13811875). Filed byCerritos Ford, Inc. d/b/a Norm Reeves Ford Superstore, Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Excerpts, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Declaration of Richard J. May)(May, Richard) (Filed on 10/21/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
