Abanto Shinno v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise
| Carlos Abanto Shinno |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise |
| 3:2019cv07175 |
| October 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Certificate of Interested Entities by Hewlett Packard Enterprise identifying Other Affiliate Primecap Management Co., Other Affiliate Dodge & Cox, Inc., Other Affiliate Blackrock, Inc, Other Affiliate Vanguard Group, Inc., Other Affiliate Hotchkiss and Wiley Capital Management LLC for Hewlett Packard Enterprise. (Trigg, Adam) (Filed on 11/26/2019) |
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hewlett Packard Enterprise (Trigg, Adam) (Filed on 11/26/2019) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. (Trigg, Adam) (Filed on 11/26/2019) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carlos Abanto Shinno. Hewlett Packard Enterprise served on 11/7/2019, answer due 11/29/2019. (Holguin-Flores, Andres) (Filed on 11/20/2019) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Carlos Abanto Shinno re #5 Summons Issued served November 7, 2019 (Holguin-Flores, Andres) (Filed on 11/20/2019) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Belinda Helzer. Escobosa (Escobosa, Belinda) (Filed on 11/12/2019) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE RE REASSIGNED CASE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an in-person Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/30/2020 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg upon reassignment. Case Management Statement due by 1/23/2020. For a copy of Judge Seeborg's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. If either party so desires, however, counsel may file a request to appear by telephone at 11:00 am, in which case the Conference will be moved to 11:00 am to be held telephonically for all parties, and all parties must contact Court Conference at 866/582-6878 at least one week prior to the Conference. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2019) |
| Filing 9 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Richard Seeborg. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi no longer assigned to the case. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2019) (bwS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2019) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2019) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Carlos Abanto Shinno.. (Holguin Flores, Andres) (Filed on 11/5/2019) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Hewlett Packard Enterprise. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2019) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 1/ 21/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/28/2020 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2019) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Holguin Flores, Andres) (Filed on 10/31/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/14/2019. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13840328.). Filed byCarlos Abanto Shinno. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Holguin Flores, Andres) (Filed on 10/30/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
