Che v. Y.M. Enterprise Inc.
| Ngoc Lam Che |
| Y.M. ENTERPRISE, INC. and Y. M. Enterprise, Inc. |
| 5:2019cv07425 |
| November 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant Y. M. Enterprise, Inc. shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 1/22/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2020) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byY. M. Enterprise, Inc.. (Keister, Kara) (Filed on 1/8/2020) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT to January 8, 2020 filed by Y. M. Enterprise, Inc.. (Keister, Kara) (Filed on 12/17/2019) Modified on 12/24/2019 (cfeS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ngoc Lam Che.. (Tsao, Pamela) (Filed on 11/26/2019) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff Ngoc Lam Che shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 12/6/2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Y. M. Enterprise, Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2019) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2019) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/27/2019. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2019) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Tsao, Pamela) (Filed on 11/12/2019) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ngoc Lam Che (Tsao, Pamela) (Filed on 11/12/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Y.M. ENTERPRISE, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13878715.). Filed byNgoc Lam Che. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit A1, #4 Exhibit A2)(Tsao, Pamela) (Filed on 11/12/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
