Tomelleri v. Glory Hole Sports, Inc.
| Joseph R. Tomelleri |
| Glory Hole Sports, Inc. |
| 5:2019cv07483 |
| November 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER APPROVAL NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All deadlines/hearings are terminated. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/27/2019. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2019)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Joseph R. Tomelleri (Matson, Gregg) (Filed on 11/26/2019) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 2/13/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/20/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2019) |
| #Electronic filing error. Case has been randomly assigned to judge, however incorrect Civil Cover Sheet used at case opening of JS44 (Rev. 02/19). Please complete and re -file as a separate docket entry Civil Cover Sheet JS-CAND 44 (Rev. 07/19) re #1 . #1 Complaint filed by Joseph R. Tomelleri (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Edward J. Davila. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13887690.). Filed byJoseph R. Tomelleri. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit AO121)(Matson, Gregg) (Filed on 11/13/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tomelleri v. Glory Hole Sports, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Glory Hole Sports, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph R. Tomelleri | |
| Represented By: | Gregg Andrew Matson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
