Nido et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
| Rita Romeu and Virginia Nido |
| Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Crestbrook Insurance Company and Joseph Poyaoan |
| 5:2019cv07724 |
| November 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Lucy H Koh |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 REPLY (re #14 MOTION to Remand and Request for Attorneys' Fees ) filed byVirginia Nido. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Reply Declaration of Alexander F. Stuart ISO Motion to Remand)(Stuart, Alexander) (Filed on 1/16/2020) |
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #14 MOTION to Remand and Request for Attorneys' Fees ) filed byCrestbrook Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Martin, Sonia) (Filed on 1/9/2020) |
Filing 17
Order by Judge Lucy H. Koh Granting #16 Stipulation.(lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2019)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #14 MOTION to Remand and Request for Attorneys' Fees Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Briefing Schedule for Plaintiffs Motion to Remand and Request for Attorneys Fees filed by Crestbrook Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Martin, Sonia) (Filed on 12/24/2019) |
| Filing 15 REPLY (re #7 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byCrestbrook Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Martin, Sonia) (Filed on 12/20/2019) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Remand and Request for Attorneys' Fees filed by Virginia Nido. Motion Hearing set for 4/23/2020 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor before Judge Lucy H. Koh. Responses due by 1/2/2020. Replies due by 1/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Alexander F. Stuart ISO Motion to Remand, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Remand and Request for Attorneys' Fees)(Stuart, Alexander) (Filed on 12/19/2019) |
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #7 MOTION to Dismiss ) Complaint Against Joseph Poyaoan filed byVirginia Nido. (Stuart, Alexander) (Filed on 12/13/2019) |
| Filing 12 **CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH** Following the case reassignment to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for March 11, 2020 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. The Joint Case Management Statement is due 7 days prior. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. Hearing on #7 MOTION to Dismiss set for April 9, 2020 at 1:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor before Judge Lucy H. Koh. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kedS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2019) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Judge Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 12/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2019)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2019) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Crestbrook Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company.. (Martin, Sonia) (Filed on 12/6/2019) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs & Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 12/6/2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2019) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Crestbrook Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. Motion Hearing set for 1/21/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Responses due by 12/13/2019. Replies due by 12/20/2019. (Martin, Sonia) (Filed on 11/29/2019) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Crestbrook Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company re #4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, 1 Notice of Removal, #5 Notice (Other), 3 Case Assigned by Intake,,, Proof of Service upon Plaintiffs' counsel by U.S. Mail on 11/27/19 (Tran, Jone) (Filed on 11/27/2019) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Crestbrook Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company re 1 Notice of Removal, Notice to Plaintiffs That Action Has Been Removed to Federal Court (Martin, Sonia) (Filed on 11/27/2019) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/18/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/25/2020 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/6/2019. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Crestbrook Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Nationwide Private Client for Crestbrook Insurance Company. re 1 Notice of Removal, (Martin, Sonia) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
| Filing 1 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byCrestbrook Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
