Barclift v. Twitter, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Khafre Barclift
Defendant: Twitter, Inc., Jack Dorsey and Ned Segal
Petitioner: Twitter Investor Group and Weston Family Partnership LLLP
Case Number: 4:2019cv07992
Filed: December 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Referring Judge: Susan van Keulen
2 Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2020 Filing 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Appointing Co-Lead Plaintiffs and Approving Co-Lead Counsel filed by Weston Family Partnership LLLP, Twitter Investor Group. (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 1/21/2020) Modified on 1/22/2020 (cpS, COURT STAFF).
January 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER Granting Stipulation and Order Extending Time For All Defendants to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/17/2020.(ygrlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2020)
January 13, 2020 Filing 24 >Notice of Withdrawal of Notice of Non-Opposition of The Weston Family Partnership LLLP to Competing Motions for Consolidation, Appointment as Lead Plaintiff, and Approval of Lead Counsel by Weston Family Partnership LLLP (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 1/13/2020) Modified on 1/14/2020 (cpS, COURT STAFF).
January 13, 2020 Filing 23 Notice that the Motion of the Twitter Investor Group for Consolidation of the Related Actions, Appointment of Lead Plaintiff, and Approval of Co-Lead Counsel is Unopposed by Twitter Investor Group (King, Laurence) (Filed on 1/13/2020) Modified on 1/14/2020 (cpS, COURT STAFF).
January 7, 2020 Filing 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for All Defendants to Respond to Complaint filed by Jack Dorsey, Ned Segal, Twitter, Inc., Khafre Barclift. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Hilary H. Mattis in Support of Stipulation Extending Time for All Defendants to Respond to Complaint)(Johnson, Michele) (Filed on 1/7/2020) Modified on 1/8/2020 (cpS, COURT STAFF).
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings re #20 Order Relating Case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Judge Beth Labson Freeman no longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2020)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER RELATING CASES 4:19-cv-7149-YGR and 5:19-cv-7992-BLF. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/2/2020. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2020)
December 26, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE by Khafre Barclift Notice of Publication of Press Release (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Press Release)(Lieberman, Jeremy) (Filed on 12/26/2019)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #15 STIPULATION AND EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT TO JANUARY 30, 2020. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/19/2019. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING #7 MOTION TO APPEAR IN PRO HAC VICE (JEREMY A. LIEBERMAN). Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/19/2019. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019)
December 19, 2019 Filing 16 SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/19/2019. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for All Defendants to Respond to Complaint and Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Jack Dorsey, Ned Segal, Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Hilary H. Mattis)(Johnson, Michele) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ned Segal (Johnson, Michele) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 13 Certificate of Interested Entities by Jack Dorsey (Johnson, Michele) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Entities by Twitter, Inc. (Johnson, Michele) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Twitter, Inc. (Johnson, Michele) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Hilary Hellmuth Mattis on behalf of Defendants Twitter, Inc., Jack Dorsey and Ned Segal (Mattis, Hilary) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth L. Deeley on behalf of Defendants Twitter, Inc., Jack Dorsey and Ned Segal (Deeley, Elizabeth) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michele D. Johnson on behalf of Defendants Twitter, Inc., Jack Dorsey and Ned Segal (Johnson, Michele) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 11, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13971834.) filed by Khafre Barclift. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Good Standing Certificate)(Lieberman, Jeremy) (Filed on 12/11/2019)
December 6, 2019 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT.Case Management Statement due by 4/23/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/30/2020 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2019)
December 5, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Jack Dorsey, Ned Segal, Twitter, Inc. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2019)
December 5, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 3/12/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/19/2020 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2019)
December 5, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2019)
December 5, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 12/5/2019)
December 5, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jack Dorsey, Ned Segal, Twitter, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13952255.). Filed byKhafre Barclift. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Schedule A, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 12/5/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barclift v. Twitter, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Khafre Barclift
Represented By: Jennifer Pafiti
Represented By: Jeremy A Lieberman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Twitter, Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth L. Deeley
Represented By: Hilary Hellmuth Mattis
Represented By: Michele D. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Dorsey
Represented By: Elizabeth L. Deeley
Represented By: Hilary Hellmuth Mattis
Represented By: Michele D. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ned Segal
Represented By: Elizabeth L. Deeley
Represented By: Hilary Hellmuth Mattis
Represented By: Michele D. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Twitter Investor Group
Represented By: Laurence D. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Weston Family Partnership LLLP
Represented By: Jennifer Pafiti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?