Chinitz v. Intero Real Estate Services
Plaintiff: Ronald Chinitz
Defendant: Intero Real Estate Services
Respondent: Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC
Case Number: 5:2019mc80279
Filed: November 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2019 Filing 13 PDF with attached Audio File. Court Date & Time [ 12/4/2019 1:36:28 PM ]. File Size [ 13104 KB ]. Run Time [ 00:27:18 ]. (courtspeak).
December 4, 2019 Filing 12 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Hearing re Plaintiff's Motion Compel Compliance with Plaintiff's Subpoena to Non-party Mojo Dialing Solutions #1 - held. Court granted motion for leave to file reply #11 . Motion to compel is granted in part as stated on the record. See minute order memorializing Court's ruling. Attorney for Plaintiff: Sabita Soneji. Attorneys for Non-Party Mojo Dialing Solutions: Mark Romance, Paul Windlust. FTR Time: 1:36pm - 2:03pm. Attachment: Minute order. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 12/4/2019)
December 3, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File a Reply in Further Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Compliance with Plaintiff's Subpoena to Non-Party Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC filed by Ronald Chinitz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff Ronald Chinitz's Reply in Further Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Compliance with Plaintiff's Subpoena to Non-Party Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC)(Soneji, Sabita) (Filed on 12/3/2019)
December 2, 2019 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING HEARING. Motion to Compel Compliance with Plaintiff's Subpoena to Non-party Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC #1 is set for 12/4/2019 01:00 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor before Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for Mojo Dialing Solutions may participate by telephone and must contact the Courtroom Deputy at Lili_Harrell@cand.uscourts.gov to make arrangements. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2019)
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #7 APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/26/2019. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2019)
November 26, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins ( #1 ) MOTION to Compel Compliance with Plaintiff's Subpoena to Non-party Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC filed by Hector Sueiro-Alvarez on behalf of Ronald Chinitz. Responses due by 11/14/2019. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2019)
November 26, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13928594.) filed by Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC. (Windust, Paul) (Filed on 11/26/2019)
November 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE NATHANAEL COUSINS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/25/2019. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2019)
November 21, 2019 Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Puerto Rico; Case Number 3:19-mc-00396. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING MOTION TO COMPEL to the Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez-Gimenez on 11/14/2019.(om)
November 14, 2019 Filing 3 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC Re: #1 MOTION requesting Order filed by Ronald Chinitz filed by Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Lopez, Andres)
November 5, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear filed by Andres W. Lopez on behalf of Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC Responses due by 11/20/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Lopez, Andres)
October 31, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Plaintiff's Subpoena to Non-party Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC filed by Hector Sueiro-Alvarez on behalf of Ronald Chinitz. Responses due by 11/14/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(gav)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chinitz v. Intero Real Estate Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Intero Real Estate Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Chinitz
Represented By: Hector Sueiro-Alvarez
Represented By: Sabita J. Soneji
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Andres W. Lopez
Represented By: Mark A. Romance
Represented By: Paul Wilfred Windust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?