Saif'ullah v. Johnson & Johnson Ethicon, Inc. et al
Khalifah E.D. Saif'ullah and Fernando A. Jackson |
San Quentin State Prison, Johnson & Johnson Ethicon, Inc., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Webster Surgery Center and M.D. Collin A. Mbanugo |
5:2020cv02844 |
April 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Virginia K DeMarchi |
PSLC HHL |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Khalifah E.D. Saif'ullah. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2020) |
Re-sent Notice of Magistrate form & postage-paid envelope to Plaintiff. (lmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2020) |
Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified text on 4/28/2020 (dhmS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Khalifah E.D. Saif'ullah. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Johnson & Johnson Ethicon, Inc., Collin A. Mbanugo, San Quentin State Prison, Webster Surgery Center. Filed by Khalifah E.D. Saif'ullah. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified on 4/27/2020 (ljf, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.