Infectolab Americas LLC et al v. ArminLabs GmbH
| Infectolab Americas LLC and IGeneX, Inc. |
| ArminLabs GmbH |
| 5:2020cv03318 |
| May 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Navdeep Kumar Singh (Singh, Navdeep) (Filed on 6/2/2020) |
Filing 12
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting #10 Motion to Continue Initial Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 12/8/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/15/2020 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (vkdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2020)
|
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by IGeneX, Inc., Infectolab Americas LLC.. (Schmidt, Kent) (Filed on 5/29/2020) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines; Declaration of Alan Iverson in Support filed by Infectolab Americas LLC. (Schmidt, Kent) (Filed on 5/28/2020) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting #7 Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice as to Alan Iverson. (vkdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2020)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting #6 Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice as to Andrew Holly. (vkdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2020)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice by Alan Iverson ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14505924.) filed by IGeneX, Inc., Infectolab Americas LLC. (Schmidt, Kent) (Filed on 5/26/2020) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice by Andrew Holly ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14505777.) filed by IGeneX, Inc., Infectolab Americas LLC. (Schmidt, Kent) (Filed on 5/26/2020) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ArminLabs GmbH. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2020) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/11/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/18/2020 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2020) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/29/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2020) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Schmidt, Kent) (Filed on 5/15/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Lanham Act Violations against ArminLabs GmbH ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14475242.). Filed byInfectolab Americas LLC, IGeneX, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schmidt, Kent) (Filed on 5/15/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
