RIOS v. ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff: VICTOR M. RIOS and Vctor M. Rios
Defendant: ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Case Number: 5:2020cv03670
Filed: June 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Susan van Keulen
Referring Judge: Lucy H Koh
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings re Order Relating Cases. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen remains as referral judge assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2020)
June 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER RELATING AND CONSOLIDATING CASE with 5:20-cv-02155-LHK. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on June 5, 2020. (kedS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2020)
June 4, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Evan George Slovak for Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Slovak, Evan) (Filed on 6/4/2020)
June 4, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Douglas Mornin for Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Mornin, Joseph) (Filed on 6/4/2020)
June 4, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Danielle Charniece Pierre for Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Pierre, Danielle) (Filed on 6/4/2020)
June 4, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen R. Hartnett for Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Hartnett, Kathleen) (Filed on 6/4/2020)
June 4, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Travis LeBlanc for Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (LeBlanc, Travis) (Filed on 6/4/2020)
June 4, 2020 Filing 10 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Rhodes, Michael) (Filed on 6/4/2020)
June 4, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Graham Rhodes for Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Rhodes, Michael) (Filed on 6/4/2020)
June 4, 2020 Filing 8 Declaration of Victor M. Rios in Support of #1 Complaint, filed byVICTOR M. RIOS. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Fallat, John) (Filed on 6/4/2020)
June 3, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2020)
June 3, 2020 Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Fallat, John) (Filed on 6/3/2020)
June 3, 2020 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/25/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/1/2020 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2020)
June 3, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/17/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2020)
June 3, 2020 #Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #2 Proposed Summons filed by VICTOR M. RIOS (INCOMPLETE) (BLANK) (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed o n 6/3/2020)
June 2, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE by VICTOR M. RIOS re #1 Complaint, NOTICE OF RELATED CASE (Fallat, John) (Filed on 6/2/2020)
June 2, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Fallat, John) (Filed on 6/2/2020)
June 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14531364.). Filed byVICTOR M. RIOS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit CV of Plaintiff - Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Declaration Declaration of Victor M. Rios)(Fallat, John) (Filed on 6/2/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RIOS v. ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VICTOR M. RIOS
Represented By: John L. Fallat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vctor M. Rios
Represented By: John L. Fallat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Represented By: Michael Graham Rhodes
Represented By: Kathleen R. Hartnett
Represented By: Travis LeBlanc
Represented By: Danielle Charniece Pierre
Represented By: Evan George Slovak
Represented By: Joseph Douglas Mornin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?