Thorsen v. Intel Corporation et al
James E. Thorsen |
Robert H. Swan, George S. Davis and Intel Corporation |
5:2020cv05549 |
August 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Edward J Davila |
Virginia K DeMarchi |
Beth Labson Freeman |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE MEMBER CASES. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/17/2020. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2020) |
Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING (16) STIPULATION IN CASE 5:20-cv-05194-EJD CONSOLIDATING RELATED ACTIONS AND VACATING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/16/2020. Associated Cases: 5:20-cv-05194-EJD, 5:20-cv-05549-EJD, 5:20-cv-05780-EJD(ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2020) |
Filing 19 Certificate of Interested Entities by George S. Davis, Intel Corporation, Robert H. Swan (Dell Angelo, Robert) (Filed on 9/10/2020) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory P. Stone Robert L. Dell Angelo and John M. Gildersleeve (Stone, Gregory) (Filed on 9/10/2020) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINTS (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1) filed by George S. Davis, Intel Corporation, Robert H. Swan. (Dell Angelo, Robert) (Filed on 9/9/2020) |
Filing 16 (Text Only) CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/29/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/5/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Hon. Edward J. Davila. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2020) |
Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by James E. Thorsen. Service waived by Robert H. Swan waiver sent on 9/2/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. (Lieberman, Jeremy) (Filed on 9/2/2020) |
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by James E. Thorsen. Service waived by George S. Davis waiver sent on 9/2/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. (Lieberman, Jeremy) (Filed on 9/2/2020) |
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by James E. Thorsen. Service waived by Intel Corporation waiver sent on 9/2/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. (Lieberman, Jeremy) (Filed on 9/2/2020) |
Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings re #11 Order Relating Cases. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Judge Beth Labson Freeman no longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2020) |
Filing 11 ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/2/2020. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2020) |
Filing 10 ORDER REGARDING SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2020) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #6 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on August 11, 2020. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2020) |
Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING #7 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on August 11, 2020. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2020) |
Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14800492.) filed by James E. Thorsen. (Hood, J) (Filed on 8/11/2020) |
Filing 6 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14800409.) filed by James E. Thorsen. (Lieberman, Jeremy) (Filed on 8/11/2020) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to George S. Davis, Intel Corporation, Robert H. Swan. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2020) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 12/3/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/10/2020 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2020) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2020) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/10/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against George S. Davis, Intel Corporation, Robert H. Swan ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14795494.). Filed byJames E. Thorsen. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Schedule A, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/10/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.