Wittbecker v. Cupertino Electric
Plaintiff: Roy Wittbecker
Defendant: Cupertino Electric
Case Number: 5:2020cv06217
Filed: September 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Referring Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2020 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGMENET CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT. Case Management Statement due by 12/10/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/17/2020 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2020)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 9/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2020)
September 8, 2020 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2020)
September 8, 2020 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Roy Wittbecker.. (Setareh, Chaim) (Filed on 9/8/2020)
September 3, 2020 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Cupertino Electric identifying Corporate Parent Cupertino Electric, Inc. for Cupertino Electric. (Fiss, Adam) (Filed on 9/3/2020)
September 3, 2020 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 11/25 /2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/2/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2020)
September 3, 2020 #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used for 1-3. [err101]Filer did not Use Correct Event and add all interested parties when prompted. Re-file this document in its entire ty and when prompted, enter all affiliates or corporate parents.Please re-file Using Correct Event and not as an attachment as to 1-3 Only. Re:[1-3] Certificate of Interested Parties, filed by Cupertino Electric (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2020)
September 2, 2020 Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint (See Exhibit E of Removal) by Cupertino Electric. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2020)
September 2, 2020 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/16/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2020)
September 2, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 20CV368613. (). Filed byCupertino Electric. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 Certificate of Interested Parties, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Fiss, Adam) (Filed on 9/2/2020) ($400 filing fee receipt # 0971-14894239) Modified on 9/2/2020 (haS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wittbecker v. Cupertino Electric
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cupertino Electric
Represented By: Adam J. Fiss
Represented By: Erik J Christensen
Represented By: Marlene S. Muraco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy Wittbecker
Represented By: Chaim Shaun Setareh
Represented By: Farrah Grant
Represented By: Thomas Alistair Segal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?