Spearhead Networks Inc. v Kuncl
| Spearhead Networks Inc. |
| Heather Kuncl, iConsult IT Partners, Inc. and Omar Rezec |
| 5:2020cv06226 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss or to Stay based on First-Filed or Abstention filed by Heather Kuncl, Omar Rezec, iConsult IT Partners, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 12/2/2020 01:00 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor before Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Responses due by 11/12/2020. Replies due by 11/19/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Decl of Brower - Agreement, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to Decl of Brower- State Complaint, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C to Decl of Brower- State Cross-Complaint)(Brower, Steven) (Filed on 10/28/2020) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Heather Kuncl, Omar Rezec, iConsult IT Partners, Inc. (Brower, Steven) (Filed on 10/28/2020) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Heather Kuncl, Omar Rezec, iConsult IT Partners, Inc... (Brower, Steven) (Filed on 10/28/2020) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: Consent or Declination. Defendants are requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge 11/9/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2020) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Spearhead Networks Inc... (Pogodin, Ph.D., Esq., Pavel) (Filed on 9/21/2020) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Heather Kuncl, Omar Rezec, iConsult IT Partners, Inc. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2020) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Pogodin, Ph.D., Esq., Pavel) (Filed on 9/3/2020) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/25/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/2/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2020) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/17/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for VIOLATION OF DEFEND TRADE SECRETS ACT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14895719.). Filed by Spearhead Networks Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pogodin, Ph.D., Esq., Pavel) (Filed on 9/2/2020) Modified on 9/3/2020 (sfbS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
