Johnson v. Tin Tin Properties, LLC, et al
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Defendant: Tin Tin Properties, LLC,
Case Number: 5:2020cv06362
Filed: September 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Referring Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER APPROVING #15 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND SITE INSPECTION DEADLINE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/4/2020.(blflc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2020)
November 3, 2020 Filing 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Site Inspection Deadline filed by Scott Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Doyle, Robert) (Filed on 11/3/2020)
November 3, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert P. Doyle, PhD (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Doyle, Robert) (Filed on 11/3/2020)
October 21, 2020 Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Tin Tin Properties, LLC,.. (Vaughan, Cris) (Filed on 10/21/2020)
October 21, 2020 Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Entities by Tin Tin Properties, LLC, re #11 Answer to Complaint (Vaughan, Cris) (Filed on 10/21/2020)
October 21, 2020 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byTin Tin Properties, LLC,. (Vaughan, Cris) (Filed on 10/21/2020)
October 5, 2020 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Johnson. Tin Tin Properties, LLC, served on 9/17/2020, answer due 10/8/2020. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed be Clerk on 9/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2020)
September 14, 2020 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2020)
September 11, 2020 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Scott Johnson.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/11/2020)
September 10, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Tin Tin Properties, LLC. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2020)
September 10, 2020 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2020)
September 10, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/24/2020. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2020)
September 10, 2020 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/10/2020)
September 10, 2020 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Scott Johnson (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/10/2020)
September 10, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14922849.). Filed byScott Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/10/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Tin Tin Properties, LLC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Represented By: Prathima Reddy Price
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Robert P. Doyle, Ph.D.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tin Tin Properties, LLC,
Represented By: Cris Campbell Vaughan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?