Johnson v. JC Realty Investment LLC et al
| Scott Johnson |
| JC Realty Investment LLC |
| 3:2020cv06544 |
| September 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE by Scott Johnson and request to vacate all currently set dates (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 11/16/2020) |
| Filing 16 Certificate of Interested Entities by JC Realty Investment LLC (Morin, Richard) (Filed on 10/7/2020) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byJC Realty Investment LLC. (Morin, Richard) (Filed on 10/7/2020) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J. Morin (Morin, Richard) (Filed on 10/7/2020) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Scott Johnson re #11 Case Management Scheduling Order, (Gutierrez, Faythe) (Filed on 10/1/2020) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Johnson. JC Realty Investment LLC served on 9/26/2020, answer due 10/19/2020. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/1/2020) |
Filing 11
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/25/2021 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/18/2021. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/23/2020. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2020)
|
| Filing 10 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Judge Edward M. Chen. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2020) |
| Filing 9 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2020) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2020) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Scott Johnson.. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/23/2020) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to JC Realty Investment LLC. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2020) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2020) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/2/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2020) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/18/2020) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Scott Johnson re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/18/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14957003.). Filed byScott Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/18/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. JC Realty Investment LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Prathima Reddy Price |
| Represented By: | Amanda Lockhart Seabock |
| Represented By: | Dennis Jay Price, II |
| Represented By: | Faythe E. Gutierrez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JC Realty Investment LLC | |
| Represented By: | Richard J. Morin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
