Nagle v. York et al
Plaintiff: David F. Nagle
Defendant: Thomas A. York and Advance Management, L.L.C.
Case Number: 5:2020cv08482
Filed: December 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Virginia K DeMarchi
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2021 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by David F. Nagle. Service waived by Thomas A. York waiver sent on 12/4/2020, answer due 2/2/2021. (Krog, Wendy) (Filed on 1/7/2021)
January 7, 2021 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by David F. Nagle. Service waived by Advance Management, L.L.C. waiver sent on 12/4/2020, answer due 2/2/2021. (Krog, Wendy) (Filed on 1/7/2021)
December 11, 2020 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by David F. Nagle.. (Krog, Wendy) (Filed on 12/11/2020)
December 4, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Advance Management, L.L.C., Thomas A. York. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2020)
December 2, 2020 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Krog, Wendy) (Filed on 12/2/2020)
December 2, 2020 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/23/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/2/2021 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2020)
December 2, 2020 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/16/2020. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2020)
December 1, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15259848.). Filed byDavid F. Nagle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Krog, Wendy) (Filed on 12/1/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nagle v. York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas A. York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advance Management, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David F. Nagle
Represented By: Wendy C. Krog
Represented By: Steven Primo Braccini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?