Menhardt v. Tracy et al
| Beatrix Menhardt and Trixi Menhardt |
| Merek Teja and Melissa Tracy |
| 5:2020cv08670 |
| December 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Case remanded to Santa Cruz County Superior Court. (Attachments: #1 Remand Order, #2 Docket) (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2021) |
Filing 12
ORDER in Response to Jurisdictional Briefs and REMANDING to State Court. Re: Dkt. Nos. #10 , #11 . ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 1/20/2021. (lmhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE re #9 Order to Show Cause,,, Terminate Motions,, #10 Response to Order to Show Cause by Beatrix Menhardt. (Eschen, James) (Filed on 1/7/2021) |
| Filing 10 Response to Order to Show Cause ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities re #9 Order to Show Cause by Merek Teja, Melissa Tracy. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2021) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND GRANTING APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Re: Dkt. Nos. #1 , #2 , #3 . The Court ORDERS Tracy and Teja to show cause in writing why this case not be remanded to state court within 14 days, by 1/7/2021. Plaintiff must file a response within 7 days of service of Defendants' response. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 12/24/2020. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/24/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Merek Teja, Melissa Tracy. (sp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/24/2020) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Beatrix Menhardt.. (Eschen, James) (Filed on 12/24/2020) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Merek Teja, Melissa Tracy (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2020) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: Consent or Declination. All parties are requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 12/24/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/3/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/10/2021 at 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Merek Teja. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Melissa Tracy. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Cruz Superior Court. Their case number is 20-cv-02156. Filed by Melissa Tracy, Merek Teja. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
