In Re Application of Olegs Fils
In Re: Olegs Fils
Case Number: 5:2020mc80176
Filed: October 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward M Chen
Referring Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2020 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE: Motion hearing re #8 Motion for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge re #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS set for 12/3/2020 is VACATED. Motion will be decided on the papers pursuant to L.R 7-1(b). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2020)
October 28, 2020 Filing 9 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Augment the Record re #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Ex Parte Application filed by Olegs Fils, #1 Ex Parte Application, #8 MOTION for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge re #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Ex Parte Application filed by Olegs Fils filed by Olegs Fils. Responses due by 11/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Decl. of Joseph R. Ashby ISO Mot. for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge, including Exhibits 18 to 28, #2 Exhibit B - Decl. of Agris Bitans ISO Mot. for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge, #3 Declaration of Joseph R Ashby ISO Motion to Augment the Record, #4 Proposed Order)(Ashby, Joseph) (Filed on 10/28/2020)
October 28, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge re #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Ex Parte Application filed by Olegs Fils filed by Olegs Fils. Motion Hearing set for 12/3/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 11/12/2020. Replies due by 11/19/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ashby, Joseph) (Filed on 10/28/2020)
October 15, 2020 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Ex Parte Application filed by Olegs Fils. Responses due by 10/28/2020. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2020)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings re #6 Report and Recommendation Denying Ex Parte Application for Leave to Seek Discovery. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020)
October 14, 2020 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Denying Ex Parte Application for Leave to Seek Discovery. Re: Dkt. No. #1 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/14/2020. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020) (cc: EMC)
October 5, 2020 Filing 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1782 by Olegs Fils. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
October 5, 2020 Filing 4 Declaration of Olegs Fils in Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA/ DUCES TECUM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO SPECIALIZE HELICOPTERS, INC., HYATT CORPORATION, HYATT CARMEL HIGHLANDS ALSO KNOWN AS HIGHLANDS INN, INC., BURST + BLOOM, SOMMPICKS LLC, BENCHMARK WINE GROUP, INC., AND BELMONT WINE EXCHANGE, LLC #1 Ex Parte Application filed byOlegs Fils. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-F)(Related document(s) #1 ) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
October 5, 2020 Filing 3 Declaration of Joseph R Ashby in Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA/ DUCES TECUM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO SPECIALIZE HELICOPTERS, INC., HYATT CORPORATION, HYATT CARMEL HIGHLANDS ALSO KNOWN AS HIGHLANDS INN, INC., BURST + BLOOM, SOMMPICKS LLC, BENCHMARK WINE GROUP, INC., AND BELMONT WINE EXCHANGE, LLC re #1 Ex Parte Application filed byOlegs Fils. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1 - 10, #2 Exhibits 11 - 17)(Related document(s) #1 ) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020) ).
October 5, 2020 Filing 2 DECLARATION of AGRIS BITANS IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO SPECIALIZED HELICOPTERS, INC., HYATT CORPORATION THE HIGHLANDS INN INC., BURST+ BLOOM, SOMMPICKS LLC, BENCHMARK WINE GROUP, INC., AND BELMONT WINE EXCHANGE, LLC #1 Ex Parte Application filed byOlegs Fils. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A - E)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
October 5, 2020 Filing 1 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA/ DUCES TECUM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO SPECIALIZE HELICOPTERS, INC., HYATT CORPORATION, HYATT CARMEL HIGHLANDS ALSO KNOWN AS HIGHLANDS INN, INC., BURST + BLOOM, SOMMPICKS LLC, BENCHMARK WINE GROUP, INC., AND BELMONT WINE EXCHANGE, LLC filed by Olegs Fils. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2020: #1 Filing Fee of $47.00 paid, Receipt # 546110185210)) (bwS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Application of Olegs Fils
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Olegs Fils
Represented By: Joseph R Ashby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?