Deng v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Zhongyang Deng |
United States Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey A. Rosen, Ken T. Cuccinelli II, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad F. Wolf, United States Department of Justice and John M. Kramar |
5:2021cv00028 |
January 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Nathanael M Cousins |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING #8 Stipulation to Extend Time Within Which Defendants Must File a Response. Defendants must file their motion for summary judgment by 6/11/2021. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2021) |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Zhongyang Deng.. (Cofano, Susan) (Filed on 2/17/2021) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation To Extend Time Within Which Defendants Must File A Response and [Proposed] Order filed by Ken T. Cuccinelli II, John M. Kramar, Jeffrey A. Rosen, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Justice, Chad F. Wolf. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 2/17/2021) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ken T. Cuccinelli II, John M. Kramar, Jeffrey A. Rosen, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Justice, Chad F. Wolf.. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 2/17/2021) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ken T. Cuccinelli II, John M. Kramar, Jeffrey A. Rosen, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Justice, Chad F. Wolf, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2021) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Cofano, Susan) (Filed on 1/6/2021) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Angela Warren (Warren, Angela) (Filed on 1/5/2021) |
Filing 3 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2021) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/19/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15397314.). Filed byZhongyang Deng. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit Exhibit M, #14 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Cofano, Susan) (Filed on 1/4/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.