Whitaker v. Oak and Fort Enterprise (U.S.), Inc
| Brian Whitaker |
| Oak and Fort Enterprise (U.S.), Inc |
| 5:2021cv00668 |
| January 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| Susan van Keulen |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Dee Potter (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Potter, Mark) (Filed on 3/16/2021)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen remains s referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 3/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2021)
|
|
Filing 12
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2021)
|
|
Filing 11
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Oak and Fort Enterprise (U.S.), Inc.. (Bacon, Daniel) (Filed on 3/15/2021)
|
|
Filing 10
STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, #9 Summons Returned Executed The parties' stipulation to extend time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's complaint due to Plaintiff's refusal to dismiss frivolous case filed by Oak and Fort Enterprise (U.S.), Inc. (Bacon, Daniel) (Filed on 3/11/2021)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Whitaker. Oak and Fort Enterprise (U.S.), Inc served on 2/16/2021, answer due 3/9/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 2/19/2021)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to Oak and Fort Enterprise (U.S.), Inc. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2021)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Brian Whitaker.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 2/1/2021)
|
|
Filing 6
*** CLERK'S ERROR POSTED IN WRONG CASE PLEASE IGNORE *** Summons Issued (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021) Modified on 2/10/2021 (cv, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 5
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021)
|
|
Filing 4
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/12/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021)
|
|
Filing 3
Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 1/28/2021)
|
|
Filing 2
Certificate of Interested Entities by Brian Whitaker (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 1/28/2021)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15502579.). Filed byBrian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 1/28/2021)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Whitaker v. Oak and Fort Enterprise (U.S.), Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brian Whitaker | |
| Represented By: | Amanda Lockhart Seabock |
| Represented By: | Mark Dee Potter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Oak and Fort Enterprise (U.S.), Inc | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Ray Bacon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
