Murphy v. Xilinx, Inc. et al
| John Murphy |
| Ronald S. Jankov, Jon A. Olson, Xilinx, Inc., Thomas H. Lee, Saar Gillai, Victor Peng, Elizabeth Vanderslice, Mary Louise Krakauer, Dennis Segers and Raman Chitkara |
| 5:2021cv00695 |
| January 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by John Murphy.. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 3/3/2021) |
| Filing 8 2ND CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff(s) shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 3/17/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2021) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff(s) shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 3/2/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2021) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Raman Chitkara, Saar Gillai, Ronald S. Jankov, Mary Louise Krakauer, Thomas H. Lee, Jon A. Olson, Victor Peng, Dennis Segers, Elizabeth Vanderslice, Xilinx, Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/21/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/4/2021 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/12/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by John Murphy re #1 Complaint, (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 1/28/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 List of Defendants)(Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 1/28/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Raman Chitkara, Saar Gillai, Ronald S. Jankov, Mary Louise Krakauer, Thomas H. Lee, Jon A. Olson, Victor Peng, Dennis Segers, Elizabeth Vanderslice, Xilinx, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15506118.). Filed byJohn Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 1/28/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
